top of page
This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.Start Now

Research

Journal Articles
  • google-scholar
  • research gate

​

  1. Skevas, T., Massey, R., & Hunt, S. L. (2023). Farm impacts of the 2019 Missouri River floods and economic valuation of flood risk reduction. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118483. [Article]

  2. Skevas, T., Massey, R., & Grashuis, J. (2022). Farmer adoption and intensity of use of extreme weather adaptation and mitigation strategies: evidence from a sample of Missouri farmers. Climatic Change, 174(1), 1-23. [Article]

  3. Grashuis, J., & Skevas, T. (2022). What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? The case of coffee producers in Peru. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12390 [Article]

  4. Skevas, T., Taylor, M.R., and Featherstone A.M., (2022). How different types of government payments and the elimination of direct payments affect farm productivity: evidence from Kansas crop farms. Applied Economics, 1-15. [Article]

  5. Skevas, T., Skevas, I., and Kalaitzandonakes, N., (2022). The role of peer effects on farmers’ decision to adopt unmanned aerial vehicles: evidence from Missouri. Applied Economics, 54 (12), 1366-1376. [Article]

  6. Segovia, M., Grashuis, J., and Skevas, T., (2021). Consumer preferences for grocery purchasing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quantile regression approach. British Food Journal. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0474

  7. Mobarok, M. H., Skevas, T., and Thompson, W., (2021). Women’s empowerment in agriculture and productivity change: The case of Bangladesh rice farms. PloS one, 16(8), e0255589. [Article]

  8. Skevas, I., and Skevas, T. (2021). A generalized true random-effects model with spatially autocorrelated persistent and transient inefficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(3), 1131-1142. [Article]

  9. Mobarok, M. H., Thompson, W., and Skevas, T. (2021). COVID-19 and Policy Impacts on the Bangladeshi Rice Market and Food Security. Sustainability, 13(11), 5981. [Article]

  10. Skevas, T., Skevas, I., and Cabrera, V.E. (2021). Examining the Relationship between Social Inefficiency and Financial Performance. Evidence from Wisconsin Dairy Farms. Sustainability, 13(7), 3635. [Article]

  11. Skevas, T., Skevas, I., and Cabrera, V. E. (2021). Farm Profitability as a Driver of Spatial Spillovers: The Case of Somatic Cell Counts on Wisconsin Dairies. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 50(1), 187-200. [Article]

  12. Skevas, T., Thompson, W., Brown, S. and Cabrera, V. E. (2020). Milk Income over Feed Cost Margin, Margin Protection Program, and Farm Finances for a Sample of Wisconsin Dairies in 2000–2017. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. doi:10.1002/aepp.13108 [Article]

  13. Skevas, T., and Cabrera, V. E. (2020). Measuring farmers' dynamic technical and udder health management inefficiencies: The case of Wisconsin dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18656. [Article]

  14. Skevas, T., and Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2020) Farmer awareness, perceptions and adoption of unmanned aerial vehicles: evidence from Missouri. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, In press. DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2019.0151 [Article]

  15. Grashuis, J., Skevas, T., and Segovia, M.S. (2020). Grocery Shopping Preferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 12, 5369. [Article]

  16. Skevas, T., and  Grashuis, J. (2020). Technical efficiency and spatial spillovers: Evidence from grain marketing cooperatives in the US Midwest. Agribusiness, 36(1), 111-126. [Article]

  17. Skevas, T. (2020). Evaluating alternative policies to reduce pesticide groundwater pollution in Dutch arable farming. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(4), 733-750. [Article]

  18. Skevas, T., Skevas, I., and Swinton, S.M. (2018). Does Spatial Dependence Affect the Intention to Make Land Available for Bioenergy Crops? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 393-412.  [Article]

  19. Skevas, T., Wu, F., and Guan, Z., (2018). Farm capital investment and deviations from the optimal path: The case of Dutch dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 561-577.

  20. Skevas, T., and Serra, T. (2017). Derivation of netput shadow prices under different levels of pest pressure. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 48(1), 25-34. [Article]

  21. Swinton, S. M., Tanner, S., Barham, B. L., Mooney, D. F., and Skevas, T. (2017). How willing are landowners to supply land for bioenergy crops in the Northern Great Lakes Region? GCB Bioenergy, 9(2), 414-428. [Article]

  22. Skevas, T., and Serra T., (2016). The role of pest pressure in technical and environmental inefficiency analysis of Dutch arable farms: an event-specific data envelopment approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 46(2-3), 139-153. [Article]

  23. Skevas, T., Guan, Z., and Peres, N.A., (2016). Economic performance and comparative riskiness of different management practices for control of botrytis fruit rot in florida strawberry. Crop Protection, 82, 82-90. [Article]

  24. Skevas, T., Swinton, S.M., Tanner, S., Sanford, G., and Thelen, K.D., (2016). Investment risk in bioenergy crops. GCB Bioenergy, 8(6), 1162-1177. [Article]

  25. Skevas, T., Hayden, N. J., Swinton, S. M., and Lupi, F., (2016). Landowner willingness to supply marginal land for bioenergy production. Land Use Policy, 50, 507-517. [Article]

  26. Skevas, T., Swinton, S.M., Meehan, T.D.  Kim, T.  Gratton, C. and Egbendewe-Mondzozo, A., (2014).  Integrating agricultural pest biocontrol into forecasts of energy biomass production. Ecological Economics, 106: 195-203. [Article]

  27. Skevas, T., Swinton, S.M., and Hayden, N. (2014). What type of landowner would supply marginal land for energy crops? Biomass and Bioenergy, 67: 252-259. [Article]

  28. Skevas, T., Stefanou, S.E., and Oude Lansink, A. (2014). Pesticide use, environmental spillovers and efficiency: A nonparametric risk-adjusted efficiency approach applied to Dutch arable farming. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2): 658-664.

  29. Skevas, T., and Oude Lansink, A. (2014). Reducing pesticide use and pesticide impact by productivity growth: the case of Dutch arable farming. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65: 191–211.

  30. Skevas, T., Stefanou, S.E., and Oude Lansink, A. (2013). Do farmers internalize environmental spillovers of pesticides in production? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 624-640.

  31. Skevas, T., Kikulwe, E.M., Papadopoulou, H., Skevas, I., and Wesseler, J., (2013). Do European Union farmers reject genetically modified maize? Farmer preferences for genetically modified maize in Greece. AgBioForum, 15(3): 242-256. [Article]

  32. Skevas, T., A., Oude Lansink, and S.E., Stefanou, (2012). Measuring technical efficiency in the presence of pesticide spillovers and production uncertainty: The case of Dutch arable farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 223: 550-559.

  33. Skevas, T., Stefanou, S.E., and Oude Lansink, A. (2012). Can economic incentives encourage actual reductions in pesticide use and environmental spillovers? Agricultural Economics, 43: 267-276.

  34. Skevas, T., Stefanou, S.E., and Oude Lansink, A. (2012). Designing the emerging EU pesticide policy: A literature review. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 64-65: 95-103.

  35. Skevas, T., Fevereiro, P., and Wesseler, J. (2010). Coexistence regulations and agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal. Ecological Economics, 69(12): 2402-2408.

  36. Skevas, T., Fevereiro, P., and Wesseler, J. (2009). Coping with ex ante regulations and ex post liability rules for planting Bt-maize – The Portuguese experience. AgBioForum, 12(1): 60-69.

bottom of page